MA Board of Ed Chair Paul Reville's First Official Remarks
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Sun 02 Sep 2007 02:44 AM EDT |
Permanent Link
|
Cosmos
Massachusetts
is a small state, but a fairly active market for the
school improvement industry - as a source of supply,
development, private sector investment, and evaluation. Readers of K-12Leads and Youth Service Markets Report know it to be a source of demand disproportionate to its student population. Higher
education's longstanding interest in k-12 is the
foundational reason. Close behind is the state's Education Reform Act of 1993,
with a real effort to create and integrate k-12 standards, assessment, accountability and funding at the state
level; and one of the nation's best charter laws when judged by the nature
of the contractual relationship and state oversight.
An effective state
board of education is still another. Recent Chairman Jim Peyser was a
force. But he was a Republican force. Democratic Governor Deval Patrick has
chosen another. As founding executive director of the
Massachusetts Business Alliance for Education (MBAE), Paul Reville was
one of several architects of the 1993 law. Republican Governor William
Weld's education guy, Steve Wilson, who went on to found the EMO
Advantage Schools (merged into Mosaica), and Democrat Mark Roosevelt, a
state representative who is now superintendent in Pittsburgh (after
training at Broad), are two others.
So Reville's first official words at his first board meeting
are worth reading, to see if the Democrats have market-oriented ideas
for public education, and any policy innovations. The most important
"take away" is that this Democrat implies authentic alliegance to the
principles NCLB I.
Schools and educators need support in order to build the necessary
expertise to achieve our unprecedented goal of educating all students
to high levels. Standards and accountability are critical cornerstones
that provide the foundation for education reform, but a foundation
alone is insufficient. The Commonwealth needs to provide the resources,
expertise, direction and opportunities for our educators to do what is
essentially a new job, educating all students to at least a level of
proficiency. In addition, the work of educating all students goes
beyond the boundaries of traditional K-12 schools. Early childhood
education, human and social services, expanded school time and after
school and summer programming are all needed in addition to a robust
Department of Education capable of providing high quality technical
assistance and support to all school districts.
Moreover, there are no caveats in these remarks about unreasonable AYP
rules, too little money, etc. That's unusual, and a good sign.