The Arts v. Math and Reading
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Thu 26 Jul 2007 10:57 AM EDT |
Permanent Link
|
Cosmos
These two stories were listed one above the other in EdNews, the aggregator of k-12 news.
The New York Times' Sam Dillon's July 25 story on a Center for Education Policy study
suggesting that in order to make AYP in math and reading, schools are
cutting back on the time spent on every other subject, but especially
soft subjects like the arts.
Your editor
remembers the same stories when the states initiated their own
standards and accountability laws. People who don't know what they're
doing do what they know, and too many educators decided that if the old
methods weren't working, more time ought to be spent doing them - just
to make sure. But sometimes the shortest distance between two points is
not a straight line. It turns out that better means of engaging
children in learning all of their subjects is likely to have a higher
payoff. And while appreciating the arts without being able to complete a
job application is a cruel irony, being able to fill out a tax form
without knowing anything of the arts is a Pyrrhic victory for society.
A day earlier, the New York Post's Chuck Bennett wrote: While arts education has long been a component of elementary-school
curricula, principals will now be held accountable for the success of
their music, art, theater and dance programs in grades K-12, the
Department of Education announced yesterday.... "When the new school year starts in September, we are going to hold
schools accountable for student progress in the arts, just as we hold
them accountable for improvements in subjects like math and reading,"
said Mayor Bloomberg...
It's a laudable
policy shift, and one that might lead educators hoping to avoid improvement
status to rethink the strategies of working harder and longer (the
brunt of which falls on kids in a double wammy of more boring drills
and less interesting breaks from the tedium), and consider strategies
that amount to working smarter.
So, yes, there is a business angle to these stories. Providers with programs that infuse the
basics with the arts and the arts with the basics, or that adopt new pedagogical strategies to engage kids, are bound to be
more attractive. They ought to be making themselves known in New York.
Eventually the rest of the country will catch up.