|
|
||||
|
Login
This Month
Year Archive
Month Archive
|
Friday, June 29
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Fri 29 Jun 2007 07:56 AM EDT
A top-notch team of researchers from your editor’s former employer find “statistically significant” improvements for students taking advantage of SES. But what is the significance of “significance” in this context? And what of the dogs that didn’t bark? What we have here is “the truth,” “and nothing but the truth,” but not quite “the whole truth.” Statistically significant effects are not necessarily educationally significant - and RAND is close to slient on the latter point. The fault here lies less with RAND, than those who will take advantage of the report's incomplete nature and a naïve public - and a Department of Education that has once again politicized education science. more »
Thursday, June 28
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Thu 28 Jun 2007 01:00 AM EDT
1) If we knew now what we didn’t know then about the influence of tutoring on student proficiency.…
2) The school improvement industry's reputation for quality is no higher than its lowest quality provider.... more »
Tuesday, June 26
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Tue 26 Jun 2007 06:46 PM EDT
No retreat, no surrender, no discussion of Reading First, no mention of a school improvement industry. more »
Monday, June 25
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Mon 25 Jun 2007 07:40 PM EDT
Pay me now or pay me more later. more »
Saturday, June 23
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Sat 23 Jun 2007 02:00 AM EDT
Blessing a "race to the bottom" or making the case for national standards? more »
Monday, June 11
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Mon 11 Jun 2007 08:52 PM EDT
School improvement providers who walk the talk of scientifically based research - reading or otherwise - need to form their own trade group and start lobbying hard for a market based on outcomes rather than marketing budgets. Their investors need to get behind them or push them into it. Absent this, expect to see cultural change at a pace that makes watching paint dry exciting by comparison. more »
Sunday, June 10
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Sun 10 Jun 2007 09:29 AM EDT
Your editor has no doubt that the academic consultants and Administration officials were engaged in a massive conflict between their duty to carry out NCLB faithfully as office holders or their agents and their personal loyalty to ideology, pedagogy or financial self-interest. Still, when the roles of the officials and the academics are untangled it is possible to see how each might honestly rationalize their actions. more »
Saturday, June 9
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Sat 09 Jun 2007 11:38 AM EDT
And NCLB changes nothing.... more »
Friday, June 8
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Fri 08 Jun 2007 02:17 PM EDT
Before NCLB the Department of Education's academic advisors enjoyed a central location but had little real influence. more »
Thursday, June 7
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Thu 07 Jun 2007 02:00 AM EDT
What the discussion of academic consultants' ethics in Reading First says about public education’s changing industry structure. A multi-part discussion. more »
Sunday, June 3
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Sun 03 Jun 2007 01:00 AM EDT
Assignment: Read SES provider spokesperson and Education Industry Association President Steve Pines’ letter to the Chicago Sun Times discussing the poor showing of most local SES providers on state tests. Then read the letter of the law. Identify the gaps and overlaps. Discuss the implications for SES providers and the broader school improvement industry in NCLB reauthorization..... more »
Saturday, June 2
by
deanmillot@mac.com
on Sat 02 Jun 2007 08:00 AM EDT
Commenting on the Department of Education's recent approaval of Adequate Yearly Progress systems based on growth models in Ohio and Indiana, the American Federation of Teachers NCLBlog Let's Get It Right, "gripe(s)" about the Department's decision to include two representatives from an education group on the fifteeen member review panel recommending the Secretarey's decision and no one who actually works in schools. Your editor is inclined to agree.... more »
|
|||